If offended, keep in mind the standard of proof you may be required to meet. You don’t want a judge making a finding like this in your case

Grayson literally seeks costs related to securing a job he does not want. Under no construction of the law does this amount to a compensable damage. Accordingly, Mr. Heller’s expert opinions fail to satisfy the third prong of the Daubert analysis.

The most important thing to know is that if you are a public figure, you don’t get much protection. Celebrities and famous people in America have to overcome a high standard of proof, especially against the news. Donald Trump famously lost his libel claim against Bill Maher based upon Maher’s claim that his biological parents were monkeys. Back in February, I noted this same problem in a post about Sarah Palin’s case against the New York Times (the link is here (Malice In Wonderland).

Don’t confuse British libel verdicts with American cases – the rules are different in the UK. Maybe they should be given the bloodlust in those papers.

Private persons (not celebrities) have an invasion of privacy (IOP) claim. These are easier to prove and come in different flavors. The links to the reports of my IOP case are found here: Doe v. Beasley Broadcast Group.

The news on good evidence of libel (as opposed to invasion of privacy) and the case filed by Alan Grayson mentioned above comes from Volokh’s excellent blog

The Volokh Conspiracy: Expert Witnesses in a Libel Case

The post Don’t Damn Me (Libel versus Invasion of Privacy) appeared first on The Thompson Law Firm.

Now, that Judge is facing a complaint.

Decorum is a real thing and it runs both ways. If you are a trial lawyer, you’ve danced this dance with a judge. You don’t win every argument and sometimes things get heated as you try to preserve your record. Judges are human and get tired of lawyers going on and trying to take control of their room. I know I’ve angered jurists and I’ve probably gone over the line a time or two. During a heated deposition of a defense expert witness psychiatrist in a med mal case, I was threatened by the witness with involuntary commitment in Louisiana – probably insane proceedings that would have been governed by the Napoleonic Code. I escaped that awkward interlude and ate turtle soup at Galatoire’s that night. Reveling in my just threatened freedom that night, I enjoyed the French Quarter more than I ever have. Sometimes, decorum is over rated.

The post Judge on a Hot Mic Catches the Wrath of a Trial Lawyer appeared first on The Thompson Law Firm.

I have extensive experience litigating and trying birth-related injury cases.

The post August 23, 2018 appeared first on The Thompson Law Firm.

“With the advent of better 3D virtual imaging with computer-assisted surgery, I think you will see more surgeries done for complex spine trauma that are more accurate, less invasive and of superior quality. One significant advantage in computer-assisted surgery will be the ability to confirm that the purposed surgery was done prior to leaving the operating room. This could save patients further surgery in the sub-acute period. In addition, the rapid interest in research and development in the area of intraoperative robotics should have a profound effect. This technology exists, but I believe that we will only improve workflow, safety, and efficiency to the point that most major centers will use this technology on a daily basis.”

The post June 8, 2018 appeared first on The Thompson Law Firm.

The post May 25, 2018 appeared first on The Thompson Law Firm.

The post May 10, 2018 appeared first on The Thompson Law Firm.

The post May 9, 2018 appeared first on The Thompson Law Firm.

The post April 25, 2018 appeared first on The Thompson Law Firm.

The post March 23, 2018 appeared first on The Thompson Law Firm.

I’m for any professional literature that quotes Carl Sandburg’s poetry.

The post December 13, 2017 appeared first on The Thompson Law Firm.